![]() |
| http://techchange.org/2010/08/23/21st-century-statecraft-what-does-it-really-mean/ |
This week we explored the topic
of 21st Century Statecraft through a variety of academic and journalistic
articles. What exactly is 21st Century Statecraft? The United States Department
of State defines 21st Century Statecraft as, "The complementing of traditional
foreign policy tools with newly innovated and adapted instruments of statecraft
that fully leverage the networks, technologies, and demographics of our
interconnected world[1]."
The idea behind 21st Century Statecraft is leveraging technology to reach out
to the people all around the world. Under this 21st Century Statecraft, mantra
the United States has created various programs such as Text Haiti, mWomen, and
the Apps for Africa Competition to just name a few. The United States is also
using tools such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to spread the 21st Century
Statecraft philosophy.
While I find the ideas of 21st
Century interesting there are inherent concerns that arise with any
governmental program. Some view these programs as simple tools to increase the
influence that America has within that country. Once we have gained the
influenced through these programs, we will begin trying to change them from
within. While these fears are mostly unfounded, historically the United States
has attempted those types of programs around the world. These concerns could
lead to less people engaging with the State Department's programs
Within the current Federal
government, no one is really prepared to take the lead on implementing these
21st Century Statecraft ideas. Jared Cohen used to his fill this role, until he
took a job in the private industry to work for Google. Jared Cohen is perhaps
most famous for asking Twitter to not go down for maintenance during the
Iranian "Twitter Revolution." When reading the New York Times Article
first about Jared Cohen, I thought that this 21st Century Statecraft thing
could actually work. Then I read the Huffington Post article and discovered
that Jared Cohen had left the State Department to work for Google. If Jared
Cohen, the "father" of 21st Century Statecraft does not want to
promote the idea, who in the Federal Government will?
Finally, a third problem with
21st century statecraft is that it may not even work as described. Research
shows that the opinion of Muslim's who participated in the State Department's
program was actually lower than those who had not participated. If the entire
purpose of these programs to improve perception of America across the world,
what have these programs actually accomplished? Without working to improve
perception of America, these programs are a waste of money.
I recognize that I may be overly
critical of these programs, but so far, they have not show the results
promised. While 21st Century Statecraft is still in the infancy stage, the
program lacks the leader to run with the idea and further develop it. I just do
not see that person emerging when the Jared Cohen, the "father" of
21st Century Statecraft, leaves the State Department for Google. Unfortunately,
the bureaucracy and red tape will make it difficult to incite the right people
to work at the State Department and remain there. If the State Department ever
finds the right leader for this program, I will reconsider my position on the
idea. Until then, I find 21st Century Statecraft an interesting idea with
terrible implementation.


No comments:
Post a Comment