The past month will perhaps have
been the strangest month I ever live. When I woke up on November 4 2011, I did
not expect the future of Penn State to change radically in front of my eyes. Since
it was our bye week, I was planning to watch the other teams across the college
football landscape. Instead, the news came out that former Penn State Defensive
Coordinator Jerry Sandusky was now facing over 40+ charges of sex crimes with
young boys. Along two with Sandusky, two
prominent members of the Penn State faced charges of perjury based on testimony
made during the grand jury. After reading the grand jury, I felt physically ill
as I read of the stories of abuse these boys allegedly faced from Sandusky.
Reading that report, I knew that things would never be the same in Happy
Valley.
The story quickly spread like wildfire across
the various news sites and social media services across the world. Just hours,
after the story broke in the United States, I knew people in Australia asking
what is going on at Penn State. The lead story of NBC nightly news that evening
was the Jerry Sandusky abuse scandal. In the week that followed, I saw at least
10 to 15 news vans parked outside of Beaver Stadium each morning. ESPN effectively
covered the scandal 24/7 during that immediate week following the release of
the charges.
On Wednesday November 8, 2011,
the Pennsylvania State Board of Trustees decided to fire Joe Paterno and Graham
Spanier for their actions in the cover up. Within minutes of the Board of
Trustees announcement thousands of students flocked to Beaver Canyon. For the
first few hours, the gathered students remained peaceful and somber. Around
midnight, the situation took a turn for the worse as the behavior shifted from
peaceful to violent. Students overturned a news van and pulled out light posts
along Beaver Canyon. Eventually, the police were able to gain control of the
situation and dispersed the crowd.
As a student at Penn State, I
have had difficulty understanding the actions taken by all of those involved in
the cover up. I am waiting to withhold complete judgment until all of the facts
come out during the trial, the facts as known are damning for all of those
involved. How can Coach Paterno who has made a career requiring football
players to do more than the minimum, just do the minimum when told of these
serious allegations? How did Penn State benefit from covering up these serious
allegations? Why did it take so long for Penn State, outside of Graham Spanier,
to respond following the indictments?
The actions of the leaders at Penn State in the immediate aftermath of
the scandal will become a case study in what not to do in the digital age. The
only statement to come out of Penn State in the initial aftermath was the
misguided statement from then President Graham Spanier. Perhaps if Penn State
had reacted in the immediate aftermath, they could have changed the story told
by the media. Instead, the media had free-reign to report the story in ways
that sold newspapers and got television viewers. By the time Penn State
reacted, it was too late to change the presentment of the story told by the
national media. In the digital age, organizations and people must react quickly
to stay on top of how the media presents the story.
This scandal will hang over Penn State for the years to come until the
trial and subsequent lawsuits are settled. Unfortunately, those not involved in
the scandal will end up paying the most, as the scandal continues to loom overhead.
The actions of a few do not define the masses. Going into the future my only
hope is that the alleged victims of sexual abuse will obtain a sense of closure
should Jerry Sandusky be found guilty of these alleged despicable crimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment